Kentucky Minimum Car Insurance Limits
TruePoint Insurance is one of Georgias fastest growing insurance agencies. We are affiliated with SIAA, a network of over 5,000 insurance agencies across the US, who by joining together have increased their strength and stability...
1000 Pine Barren Rd.
Pooler, GA 31322
Phone : 912-330-1265
Email : info@truepointgroup.com
If your business has never had to turn in an insurance claim many will tell you to consider yourself lucky. Others may tell you to give yourself a pat on the back. At TruePoint, we will tell you that it is highly likely that both are true.
No one enjoys turning in an insurance claim. Once we get past the fact that no one is injured, an explosion of thoughts race through our minds. How much is this going to cost? What’s my deductible? How much will my insurance premium go up? Will I get canceled?
The one thought that is seldom considered is, “will my insurance company deny the claim?” Most small businesses seldom consider needing anything more than a General Liability policy. If you are a contractor that has had a past claim denied, then you most likely know where we are headed.
General Liability Insurance or GL covers a boatload. Even if you are not liable, it will pay claims made against you by a third party. Most legal fees, settlement costs, damages to property, bodily injury and more are covered. Your general liability policy should also pay claims related to slander or libel. It will also pay for some construction-related claims as long as they fall under the completed products coverage.
Most claims not covered by the general liability coverage policy are logical. First off we can exclude every claim not related to damages that we’ve caused to others. Buildings and other property must be covered by a property form. Some liability related losses are not covered by the commercial general liability (CGL) policy. The following are some of the most obvious examples:
• Property Damage and Body Injury resulting while operating a vehicle Commercial Auto Policy
• Injuries to employees while at work Workers Compensation
• Liability coverage for Doctors, Lawyers, etc. Professional Liability
Professional liability insurance is sometimes referred to as errors and omissions insurance or E&O. Warning to the wise, take care to review all policies. Professional Liability and Errors & Omission coverages differ. While E&O is more applicable to most contractors, it’s crucial that you make sure that the product you are buying provides the coverages you need.
Why is it that certain professions need E&O insurance and other need General Liability?
First of all, I don’t think this is a simple as flipping a switch. Up for GL and down for E&O. The two are entirely different and independent coverages, and many businesses are apt to need both to be adequately insured.
We mentioned earlier that General Liability insurance doesn’t cover certain losses. We already identified a couple of the more obvious types. You should also be aware that negligence, failure to offer a service, failure to act in good faith, misrepresentation are a few additional examples of exposures not covered by a CGL policy.
Do the gaps in General Liability coverages mean that contractors and other construction-related industries need Errors and Omission coverage? Possibly, each case is different. But if you’re not considering it, then you may need to find an agent that will work through the issues and provide enough insight into the question for you to make the right decision.
Most contractors have enough exposure that they could benefit by adding E&O coverage to their existing policy. The approach TruePoint takes in exploring whether Errors and Omissions should be added is no different than the way we treat any other coverage that is required. We start defining the types of risk that are being considered. In the case of contractors E&O we would ask questions similar to those below:
1. Does your General Liability insurance protect you against claims for faulty work?
o You’re correct if you answered NO! Advance to #2.
o General Liability does not provide coverage for defective work. Call (502) 410-5089 or go to www.insuringky.com to learn more if you answered question 1 in the affirmative.
2. Does your General Liability cover your work and products?
o Again you are correct if you answered NO! Advance to #3.
o General Liability does not cover your work or products. If you answered YES visit our site www.insuringky.com to learn more about TruePoint Insurance.
Contractors can have significant gaps in coverage that can be eliminated or reduced by adding Contractors’ E&O. The next step that we advise is to determine your exposure. We begin by developing a risk profile which at a very basic level answers the following:
• your potential loss exposure (both a median or average potential loss as well as a max loss)
• the expected frequency of the type loss being considered
The final step is to help you decide if the cost of the added coverage is reasonable relative to the reduced exposure:
• We determine the cost to transfer the risk (in this case, how much will you pay for the E&O Policy)
• And we then compare the cost to insure versus the exposures identified in the risk profile.
TruePoint works with commercial accounts in Kentucky and Southern Indiana to help them better understand their business insurance needs. Our focus is on how we can help you to most effectively develop and execute a strategy for your commercial insurance needs.
I would be very interested in how you answer the following question. So if you have the time to comment, please leave a reply at the end of this post, including the season, month or holiday as well as insights why? Just curious!
Question: What’s your best insurance analogy?
For me the answer is easy. It depends on the current season. Of course, I am an insurance agent, which means I can draw a correlation to insurance to everything. That includes the bologna sandwich I am eating. However, this time of year there seems to be an almost endless list of things to associate with insurance. Below are just a few:
Each of the above associations are valid, but it is the Peanuts analogy that rings the loudest. Insurance shouldn’t be about selling, Insurance is about trust. Think of Lucy as being the insurance agent. Sure she’s a salesperson, a salesperson with a bad memory. She will do everything in her power to convince Charlie Brown to trust that she will hold the ball.
Insurance is something you are required to have or should have. Maybe you don’t know you need it yet, but if you need it then it’s not selling, it’s educating. Everyone knows that Charlie Brown is going to kick the ball. Charlie knows he’s going to, even though she’s not there, the little red-haired girl knows, and yes Lucy knows that Charlie Brown is going to try and kick the ball!
So if Lucy knows that Charlie Brown is going to kick the ball, why does she have to use the full-blown sales pitch? Seriously, she doesn’t have the best reputation to start with. So why not just shoot straight? High-pressure sales must be addictive. Just like Lucy, it seems that there continue to be too many insurance producers trying to sell something that can only be earned. Trust!
So if Lucy is symbolic of the fast-talking hard selling insurance agent, they who should be associated with the insurance consumer. A case can be made for both Charlie Brown and Linus. Both characters display faith that is foolish. This is very similar to what insurance consumers are doing. Savvy consumers are asking questions aimed at obtaining adequate coverages at a fair price, while the foolish are lining up to be sold.
Linus also displays a firm commitment and faith in his beliefs. Once again he forgoes the annual Halloween candy score while failing to prove his theory about the Great Pumpkin. From this standpoint Linus is similar to consumers that refuse to seek advice from multiple sources. Just as Linus’ belief in the Great Pumpkin left him with no candy; insurance consumers may be confronted with paying too much for insurance, being sold inadequate coverages, or both.
Businesses that have been successful for decades are usually ones that also consistently take care of their property. While maximizing the use of every asset, it also raises a coverage issue. Aging equipment may have reached the point where it:
Such property can be difficult to insure since a typical commercial property policy considers obsolete items to be worthless. However, a commercial property policy can be modified with a form that may make coverage more practical. One form, called “Functional Personal Property Valuation,” changes a policy so that the regular policy conditions on valuing a loss and coinsurance don’t apply.
Functional valuation recognizes that the insured firm’s priority is to repair damaged, older equipment or to find an equivalent substitute. A policy with a functional valuation provision is likely to offer the additional option of paying an amount equal to the damaged or destroyed property’s market value that it held just before their loss. Other features are requirements that any repairs be done quickly and that any replacement property is at the same site and for the same use of the property that was lost or destroyed. A coverage modification is also likely to add terms with special definitions, such as “replacement” or “functional equivalent,” or “market value.”
A policy that has been altered in order to use a functional settlement basis should result in smoother claims handling and a better loss to post-loss transition. Arranging for such coverage may also spur a buyer to identify possible sources for replacing his vulnerable, older property.
If your concern is one that may be dependent on older equipment, it may be past the time that you discuss your particular coverage need with a knowledgeable insurance professional.
COPYRIGHT: Insurance Publishing Plus, Inc. 2015
All rights reserved. Production or distribution, whether in whole or in part, in any form of media or language; and no matter what country, state or territory, is expressly forbidden without written consent of Insurance Publishing Plus, Inc.
Generally, a homeowners insurance policy includes at least six different coverage parts. The names of the parts may vary by insurance company, but they typically are referred to as Dwelling, Other Structures, Personal Property, Loss of Use, Personal Liability and Medical Payments coverages. They are usually presented as policy sections and are often labeled Coverages A through F. This article discusses Coverage Parts A, B, and C, which protect property.
Coverage A, Dwelling
The homeowner policy’s first coverage section protects your house and any attached structures, such as garages, decks or fences. The typical policy covers your home when it is damaged by many perils (also known as causes of loss) including fires or storms. However, the following causes of loss are usually excluded from coverage under the homeowner’s policy:
Coverage B, Other Structures
This coverage section protects structures that are not attached to the home, such as a detached (separate) garage, storage or utility shed playground equipment and swimming pools.
Coverage C, Personal Property
This covers your possessions, whether they are at your home or away with you on vacation. Personal property is often covered on a named peril basis. This means that only the causes of loss listed in the policy section are covered. The coverage is also subject to limitations and exclusions. Types of property having significant value, such as jewelry, fine arts, collectibles, etc., may require special protection. Talk to your agent about scheduling (adding) coverage on a floater which broadens and extends coverage for high-valued possessions.
Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost
Commonly, protection under sections A and B is provided on either an actual cash value or a replacement cost basis. Actual cash value is defined as replacement cost minus depreciation. Replacement cost is the actual cost to replace the structure, regardless of depreciation. Check your policy to see which type of coverage you have. Coverage under section C is usually provided on an actual cash basis. However, your agent may be able to add replacement cost to your possessions just like that found in Coverage A.
Part one discussed how a typical homeowner policy covers buildings and structures. Now let’s look at Coverage Part D, which is also a property coverage; as well as Coverage Parts E and F. These latter parts address coverage for injuries to persons or damage to property that belongs to others.
Coverage D, Loss of Use
This coverage handles the cost of additional living expenses while your home is being repaired. The coverage also applies if the home is unusable. However, the loss or loss of access has to be the result of an event that is covered by the policy. For instance, if your home was damaged during a war and you had to abandon it, Coverage D would not be available because war is excluded. Additional expenses normally include food, housing, and transportation. However, the expenses must exceed what your family normally incurs.
Coverage E, Personal Liability
This Coverage Part responds if you are legally responsible for causing property damage or physical injury. Protection includes paying for your defense costs and any financial judgment for covered incidents. Naturally, the coverage would not apply for excluded situations, such as intentional injuries. Example: Joe is sued by a guy he injured after tackling and repeatedly punching him during a pickup basketball game. The injuries from this incident are not accidental and would not be covered.
Coverage F, Medical Payments
This Part provides rapid reimbursement for minor injuries, such as a guest who trips and falls while visiting your home. This coverage does not apply to a family member. For example, if your child and your neighbor’s child are both injured while playing and need to go to the emergency room, this coverage will pay for your neighbor’s expenses but not for your own child.
This is a brief overview of homeowners insurance. All of the coverage provided by the homeowner’s policy is subject to limitations such as exclusions, policy limits, and deductibles. It’s important that you discuss the details of coverage and any other insurance questions with your insurance agent.
Most state financial responsibility laws require proof that you are able to pay for any damage or injury you may cause while driving. Auto insurance is the way that most people comply with these laws. Typically compliance only takes liability insurance at some minimal limit that varies by state. Liability coverages include the following:
Bodily Injury Liability – insures against injury that you may cause to other persons. The key is that it involves you being held financially responsible for injuries to other persons because of your driving, your ownership or other use of your vehicle.
Property-Damage Liability – handles damage that you may cause to another person’s property. Again, the coverage only responds when you are financially responsible for such damage and it has to be related to your use or ownership of a vehicle.
Uninsured Motorist Coverage – This coverage typically pays for injury you suffer from an accident caused by a person who has no insurance; a person who can’t be located (“hit and run drivers”); or a person who has insurance but their insurance company is insolvent.
Important: Payment under this coverage is controlled by various laws that dictate what limit or limits must be sold. In some states, you may have an option to reject the coverage. Typically, the rejection must be in writing.
Underinsured Motorist Coverage – Similar to uninsured motorist, it pays for injuries caused by a driver who is inadequately insured. Example: You are seriously injured by someone carrying a bodily injury limit of $25,000, but your injuries are nearly $50,000. Your Underinsured Motorist Coverage limit is $100,000. In this instance, your policy would pay the difference between $25,000 and $50,000.
Cars are expensive to buy and repair, providing great reasons for protecting them. If you borrowed money to buy your car, or if you leased the vehicle, the lender or leasing company was likely to make certain that you had coverage to pay for any damage to the vehicle. Below are typical coverages that apply either to the vehicle or to those operating the vehicle:
Collision coverage – This covers damage to your own vehicle that happens when your vehicle runs into another object, such as other vehicles, trees, light poles, mountains, etc.
Other Than Collision coverage – This also covers damage to your own vehicle that is due to sources such as fire, theft, hitting an animal, vandalism, earthquake, flood or hail.
Collision and Other Than Collision coverages are subject to deductibles (the amount a policyowner must pay). They eliminate the need for an insurer having to pay for very minor losses.
Personal Injury Protection or Medical Expense – This coverage typically handles medical expenses for injuries to you, your passengers or people who are “around” you. It may also cover you and your household if you, as a pedestrian or a bicyclist, are struck by an automobile.
Towing and Labor coverage – This coverage is to help pay for your costs to deal with a disabled car. It could help pay for the car to be towed to a service station or for any repair that occurs at the location of the car’s breakdown. Note that this coverage is for labor rather than the costs of car parts. Available coverage is minimal (often $25-$75).
Rental Reimbursement – This coverage reimburses your expense of renting a car as a temporary replacement. The car being replaced must be an insured car that’s unavailable for use because of it being damaged, lost (stolen) or destroyed in a covered loss.
Important: This is merely an introduction to complex policy coverages. Be sure to contact your agent for detailed insurance information.
Indemnity occurs when an individual or entity receives reimbursement and is made whole for a loss. Insurance policies provide indemnity to the insured when the insurance company pays claims on losses that are directly related to a covered cause of loss.
Most forms of insurance are consider a contract of indemnification or contract of indemnity. A contract of indemnity requires that an insured be made whole in the event of a loss. The contract further states that the insured may only be made whole. Better said, the insured cannot profit from the contract of indemnity.
The no profit clause in the contract of indemnity is critical to insurance companies and insureds as well. Without it, individuals could legal receive economic benefits from an insured loss. This would expose insurance companies to adverse selection, higher claims, which would result in higher premiums for consumers.
Congratulations! You’ve Purchased A Motor Home
The staff at TruePoint Insurance in Fisherville, KY knows that the truth about what you need with insurance is the most important factor. The staffers here are honest and will tell you exactly what is necessary to make your motorhome experience the very best that it can be. You’ve taken the plunge. You’ve purchased the motorhome. Now, how do you best protect it?
Arm Yourself With Information
The best insurance policies are written when consumer and insurance agents know everything there is to know about what has to be protected. It’s your motorhome. Ask yourself some key questions to get your mind rolling as well as your insurance agents.
Arm yourself with answers to these five questions before you consider the amount of coverage and type of coverage you will need for your motorhome:
A complete, comprehensive conversation with an insurance agent at TruePoint Insurance in Fisherville, KY today can negate regrets tomorrow. Call us today or come in so that we can discuss how your motorhome can be the rolling bed of recreational freedom and enjoyment for yourself and your family.
Individuals and business also practice a direct from risk avoidance. Suppose you sold your car and committed to using public transportation. Without a car, you have successfully eliminated your primary automobile liability exposure. And without the risk, you are no longer required to carry the state-mandated insurance.
Businesses might opt to outsource specific functions allowing them to eliminate multiple risks ranging from property to casualty to workers compensation. Altering production methods, implementing automation, and revising policies and procedures are just a few avenues where businesses can eliminate specific risk.
Risk avoidance is not a practical solution for all exposures, but it can be a very cost-effective solution when implemented correctly. Those practicing this method must realize that risk avoidance may not be as simple as it appears. You may have noticed in the auto liability example above, the phrase “primary exposure.” This suggests that there continues to be potential exposure even after the sale of the vehicle.
You don’t have to own a vehicle to drive. People rent cars all the time. While it is hard to imagine a scenario where you could rent a vehicle without liability insurance if you did you would be exposed. A more likely scenario would be your exposure in the event you borrowed a friend’s car. Coverage stays with the auto, so as long as you had permission from your friend to drive their vehicle, the policy covering the car would protect you.
Borrower Beware! What auto liability limits does your friend have? Did you ask? Does it matter? Let’s assume that the vehicle has the minimum coverages allowed by your state. For us, that would be $25,000 for bodily injury for any one person, capped at $50,000 if multiple individuals are injured and $25,000 for property damage.
As the driver of the vehicle, you are potentially liable for damages that exceed the vehicles policy limits. In this scenario, the vehicle coverages are limited, placing you in a position with significant exposure. In your past, this wasn’t an issue. When you owned an auto and had insurance, your policy extended liability protection to you even when it wasn’t your car. Your decision to practice risk avoidance has triggered additional and perhaps unforeseen exposures.
There is an old saying, “You’re picking up pennies in front of a train,” or more simply said, you’re taking too much risk for only a modest reward. If you practice risk avoidance, you better know the train schedule.
What is risk reduction role in risk management? Unlike the other three methods, risk reduction is not a stand-alone method. It is more akin to a complimenting strategy or modification. Examples of risk reduction would be businesses utilizing sprinklers, keeping parking lots and sidewalk free from ice and snow, or preemptively addressing employee actions that put an organization at risk. Individuals performing regular maintenance on their home or auto are practicing risk reduction. Installing a security system or erecting a fence with a locked entry gate around a pool are also examples of individuals utilizing risk reduction techniques.
When combing risk reduction methods with risk retention, the results directly benefit the individual or business. These actions may have one of two outcomes. The installation of a sprinkler system is an action that results in lessening the loss. Steps taken to reduce risk can also lower the probability of loss. The previously mention action to address snow and ice removal would most likely reduce the potential for a loss.
The role of Loss Control can be confusing. Insurance companies can be viewed as risk management consultants and as risk transfer solutions. However, a fine line exists between providing beneficial risk management counseling and becoming a deterrent to business. The action of an insurance companies loss control efforts can easily gauge the company’s success in balancing the two roles. When this group with providing risk reductions techniques for the insured they become a catalyst for change that becomes genuinely value added for both the insured and the insurer. Loss Control units aimed at creating awareness of potential risk reduction opportunities will have a positive financial impact on the insurance company, which should, in turn, have a positive effect on the insured’s cost of risk management.
When you buy an insurance policy, you are purchasing much more than a risk transfer agreement. The insurance policy today has evolved to incorporate many aspects of risk sharing, risk retention and indirectly risk avoidance. The final method of risk management, risk reduction also comes into play. Acting primarily as an incentive, or a chance to reduce the overall cost insurance.
So what is insurance? Today, insurance is a contract/relationship between an insured and an insurer where the insurer utilizes modern risk management tools and encourages proactive steps by the insured which will lead to an increasingly efficient process of indemnifying the insured against specified peril(s).
Some people think that insurance is risk management. But industry professionals will argue that insurance coverage is only one component of the risk management process. What’s the difference between the two? Risk management is a discipline used to identify, evaluate and address specific risks. A risk management plan will utilize one or more of the four risk management methods.
Risk Avoidance Risk elimination
Risk Reduction Reduce
Risk Sharing Transfer, Insurance
Risk Retention Do Nothing, Self-Insure
If insurance isn’t risk management, then what is it? Insurance is commonly considered to be a mechanism for risk transfer. If you look up the word insurance, you are apt to find the words “transfer of risk” or “risk sharing.” So insurance is risk sharing or risk transfer? Yes. But it’s more.
Insurance is a mechanism that can be used to transfer risk from one party to another. In exchange for a premium, insurance companies will agree to provide indemnification. Indemnification, or the protection against loss, can be purchased to mitigate a large number of exposures. Insurance products exist to transfer both property and liability risks.
Insurance Today
“Ah, the joys of homeownership,” words muttered regularly by homeowners. Homes generate problems. Many associated with either property or casualty exposures. Typically these risks are transferred to an insurance company through a homeowner’s policy. In a pure form of risk transfer, the insurance company would make the insured whole in the event of a specified loss. But most of us don’t transfer all the risk. The amount we recoup will be the value lost less a deductible.
Most property policies have a built-in risk retention mechanism, the deductible. On the surface, this may seem to be negative. But before making these assumptions consider why it’s there. The deductible is in fact risk retention. By retaining the first $500, $1,000 or more, the insured can significantly lower the cost of insurance. Without deductibles, insurers would become inundated by the number of small claims. Smaller claims would also adversely impact administrative cost markedly. Finally, without a deductible, insurance company’s exposure to fraudulent claims would likely skyrocket. Without a deductible, insurers would face mounting costs that could only be offset by raising premiums.
At first blush, deductibles appear to work to the benefit of the insurance companies. Deductibles no doubt benefit insurance companies. But after considering the implications, it would seem that consumers are reaping the most value.
When insurance companies avoid risk it benefits the company and the consumer
You may have learned from experience that insurance companies will not provide coverage in some instances. Insurance companies don’t want all risks. By insuring only the risk that they prefer, they are practicing risk avoidance. Trampolines, pit bulls, fireplaces, and log homes are good examples of risk that many insurance companies avoid.
Insurance companies underwriting higher risk exposures are expected to have increased losses. What does this mean for the insured? That’s hard to say. It doesn’t mean that you can’t get insurance. You most likely can. It does mean that you will have fewer options and in most cases, reduced competition leads to higher costs.
Rejecting certain risk helps insurance companies, but how does it help the consumer
The practice of risk avoidance improves insurance companies underwriting results. In theory, insurance companies that can successfully manage their risk are more likely to have higher profitability and faster capital growth. As the company’s capital grows, so does the need to write additional insurance. If enough insurance companies are experiencing the same results, competition will increase. The increased appetite for risk will ultimately impact the insured, by putting downward pressure on premiums.
Trickle-down risk management
The benefits from risk avoidance can be direct or indirect. The risk avoidance techniques used by insurance companies have both a direct and indirect effect. As mentioned, the direct actions put downward pressure on the cost of insurance. These practices can passively encourage consumers to avoid unacceptable risks. Over time, sound risk management practices trickle-down which further reduce risk management costs.